Healthcare Areas
Also in this section
- Primary Healthcare
- Clinical care
- Delivery of care
- Consistent use of the same primary care provider (provider continuity)
- Consistent use of the same primary care clinic (clinic continuity)
- Primary care provider use of various visit types
- Emergency department visits for minor conditions
- Family doctor visit after a hospital stay for selected chronic conditions
- Patient experience
- Patients’ experience with primary care providers’ listening
- Patients’ rating of primary care provider’s explanations
- Patients’ experience with appointment length
- Patients’ experience with primary care provider’s respect
- Patients’ experiences with their primary care provider involving them in care decisions
- Patient experience with care coordination
- Patient experience with primary care provider availability
- Patients’ overall experience with their primary care provider
- Emergency Department
- Wait times
- EMS response time for life-threatening events
- Time spent by EMS at hospital
- Patient time to see an emergency doctor
- Patient emergency department total length of stay (LOS)
- Length of time emergency department patients wait for a hospital bed after a decision to admit
- Time to get X-ray completed
- Emergency department volumes
- Delivery of care
- Hospital patients who require an alternate level of care
- Length of patient hospital stay compared to Canadian average length of hospital stay
- Patients who left without being seen (LWBS) by an emergency department doctor
- Patients waiting in the emergency department for a hospital bed
- Hospital occupancy
- Patient experience
- Patient experience with staff introductions
- Patient experience with communication about follow-up care
- Patient experience with help for pain
- Communication with patients about possible side effects of medicines
- Patient reason for emergency department visit
- Overall patient experience with emergency department communication
- Overall rating of care
- Highlight Meaningful Changes
- Wait times
- Hospital Care
- Delivery of care
- Patient experience
- Overall rating of care
- Patient experience with talking with staff about help needed at home
- Patient experience with staff helping with pain
- Patient experience with information about their condition and treatment
- Patient experience with involvement in care decisions
- Patient experience with communication with nurses and doctors
- Client experience
- Client experience with courtesy and respect
- Client experience with listening
- Client experience with reaching their case manager
- Client experience with case manager (help with community services)
- Client experience with care plan involvement
- Client experience with care plan meeting needs
- Client experience with independence (home set-up)
- Client experience with independence (staff encouragement)
- Client experience with personal care staff capability
- Client experience with communication about a visit cancellation
- Client experience with pain management
- Client experience with reviewing medications
- Client experience with help to stay at home
- Client experience with family doctor being informed
- Client overall care experience
- Clinical care
- Symptoms of delirium
- Mood worsened from symptoms of depression
- Behavioural symptoms improved
- Inappropriate use of antipsychotics
- Worsening pain
- New pressure ulcers
- Physical restraint use
- Unexplained weight loss
- Cognitive performance
- Frailty and risk of health decline
- Potential depression
- Activities of daily living
- Delivery of care
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Family experience of resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family experience with staff responsiveness
- Family overall rating of care
- Resident experience
- Resident overall experience
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Delivery of care
- Resident experience
- Resident experience with decision-making
- Resident experience with food
- Resident experience with getting their healthcare needs met
- Resident experiences with sharing concerns
- Resident experiences with feeling safe
- Resident experiences with independence
- Resident experiences with rules
- Resident experiences with activities
- Resident overall experience
- Family experience
- Family experience with courtesy and respect
- Family experience with decision-making
- Family experience with food
- Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
- Family experience with resident cared for by the same staff
- Presence of a resident and family council
- Family experience with sharing concerns
- Family experience with staffing
- Family overall rating of care
Continuing Care Homes: Type B
Designated Supported Living
Family experience with healthcare services and treatments
How family members rated how often their loved one received all the care and services they need, in a 2022-23 survey. (see data definition)
What do you think?
- Why does understanding the family member experience matter when considering how often their loved one receives necessary healthcare services and treatments?
- Are there differences between zones? Between providers? Between mainly rural and urban zones or sites? What factors could account for these differences?
Understanding “family experience with healthcare services and treatments”
In a survey conducted in 2022-23, Health Quality Alberta asked family members of residents living in continuing care homes – type B (formerly called designated supportive living):
In the last three months, how often did your family member receive all of the healthcare services and treatments they needed?
Family members could choose “Never / Sometimes / Usually / Always”
Considerations when viewing the results:
There are a number of factors providers and leaders can consider to better understand and improve family members’ rating of how often they felt their loved one received all the healthcare services and treatment they needed. Before taking action, consider the following:
- What are family members thinking about when considering “healthcare services and treatments?” How might family members view and describe “healthcare services and treatments” differently than providers? Than residents? Once the needs and expectations are better understood, how could available healthcare services and treatments be improved to better address resident needs?
- What is the difference between the family and resident experience around healthcare service and treatment delivery? How are results different?
- How do family members stay informed about what healthcare services are available to their loved one and their frequency? What options are available to family members if they want more of the available services or treatments for their loved one, or other services not provided by the site?
- How do family members stay informed about their loved one’s preferred healthcare services and treatments?
- How might the care planning process impact this result? The basket of healthcare services and treatments a resident needs may be part of the resident’s care plan, the document that outlines a resident’s needs and preferences. A care plan is developed in collaboration with a case manager and healthcare team, the resident, their family member(s) where appropriate, and the resident’s physician. How is the care planning process completed, managed, and updated? How do family members stay engaged with this process?
- Which accommodation standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Which Continuing Care Health Service Standard(s) does this question help inform, if any?
- Who should be involved in discussions to improve these results? How could residents and/or family members be engaged to develop solutions (e.g., engage the resident and family council)? What other collaboration might be required to make improvements in this area?
For information about Health Quality Alberta’s Facility-based Continuing Care Survey, please visit Health Quality Alberta’s website.
