Information in this chart comes from the Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) and tells us about the cognitive performance, or the ability of continuing care home residents to think, reason, or remember. These results provide information specifically about residents’ memory recall, their ability to communicate and make themselves understood, and daily decision-making (e.g., when to eat).

The cognitive performance of a resident in these areas is regularly assessed by care staff to present a score that includes these categories:

• Intact (0),
• Borderline intact (1),
• Mild impairment (2),
• Moderate impairment (3),
• Moderate/severe impairment (4),
• Severe impairment (5), and
• Very severe impairment (6).

A score of 0 means that a resident has no challenges in any area, and a score of 6 means that a resident is very severely challenged in all areas of this measure, or is comatose.

This chart shows the percentage of residents with relatively intact cognitive functioning (score of 0 or 1), mild/moderate impairment (score of 2 or 3), and severe impairment (score of 4 to 6) over time.

The information in this chart can best inform system-level planning for quality improvement, program development, and resource allocation. This is because this data, when reported at an aggregate level, provides a description of the population that requires services in relation to cognitive performance. It does not describe the quality of care or services provided at a site.

When thinking about this information, providers and leaders can consider a number of things to better understand these results. Some questions they should consider before taking action include:

• How would you describe the cognitive performance of the continuing care home – type A (formerly long term care) resident population across Alberta? What might the proportion of residents with severe impairment mean for program planning?
• Given that the population of residents in Alberta has varying levels of cognitive impairment, what types of care, supports, and services are required to ensure safety and quality? Consider the different needs of residents and their families, sites, and zones.
• What are some leading care practices and interventions that can reduce the risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., reduced involvement in day-to-day life) for residents with higher levels of cognitive impairment? For those that are cognitively intact? Are there additional opportunities to leverage these practices in Alberta?